Suspicions after the Queen’s death opened the way for Charles to become king. Some say this installed him as Antichrist.
Listen to “King Charles Is Antichrist?” on Spreaker.
Prince Charles, now King Charles, did give impression of controversy when he said he would be defender of faith. He left it to mean a defender of an ecumenical joint expression of any faith, not any one specific. This left the role of the Parliament to uphold the Protestant Christian faith in question. Charles also ahs been present with Klaus Schwab to uphold the Great Reset of the WEF.
Since the installing of Prince Charles advanced to King after the death of Queen Elizabeth, some suspect this will promote the actions of Antichrist. We often plug in our most prominent leader into this position of Antichrist. Nero was Antichrist, Hiter was Antichrist, Reagan was Antichrist, Bush was Antichrist, Obama was, Trump was. Of course I probably missed some. They have positions that put them in line.
However some overlook the scripture and who it calls out as Son of Perdition, man of sin (2Thes 2). We explain possibilities that could be considered. Is it the King or some other figure?
We also go over the stipulations for the Mark of the beast. What is the mark, can a believer be tricked into it? Do we warn others not to take the mark to save them from perishing?