Have you been tracking all the news? If you have you may have witnessed the uncertainty. Funny how an election year in the U.S. brings many uncertainties as
- we are introduced another term OR another President
- no one knows the status of the economy
- many promises are made
- everyone has a bias going in and few change just because of debates or conversation
Along with the politics comes expectations of economic crash, hype of stifling policies of oppression one the people, speculations of Marxism increasing, persecution of all those who fail to comply.
Folks, this has been the speculations since I’ve been tracking these things (30 or so years). They just recirculate over and over. Every year we are told the election is critical and this is IT! Then we sustain another four years and adjust. Some do see a bit of results personally, but overall we survive and no one was tossed into a den of lions. BUT could it happen? Perhaps one day if we let it. That is what people fear.
You see, they run on fear. People run on fear and it stimulates adrenaline, the Elite use fear to disable citizens because fear can control. You can’t let that happen to you. Fear is the psyops.
This is how the political system has run, they put up candidates and we choose which one we prefer. One is generally good cop (Republican/Conservative), the other is bad cop (Democrat/Marxist). Most in the truther community assumably pose as Conservatives rather than Marxists, but certainly may be some crossover. It is an Hegelian Dialectic. For people who wonder what that is, simply, it is a Thesis (problem), antithesis (reaction), synthesis (solution). It means holding up two opposite extremes that you get split down the middle. The middle is where you should be concerned about.
First of all let me say that if there truly was an opposing party (Republicans for all descriptive purposes), they should be utterly appalled to the leverage Democrats have with the system and be fighting with all vigor to expose it, challenge it, and destroy it. But they want to play fair (that means to yield to their opposition). They in fact fear these dominant groups. I’ve spoken to Republican campaigns asking what they plan to do with the Marxists running over them. They admitted they fear their power and will wait until we get them next time (meaning at the polls). Unfortunately that is NOT going to happen. The polls is a weak measure of who we prefer, but does not prevent the Socialists from controlling the system. They even bribe Republicans. So therefore I’ve concluded the representing party of opposition is weak and unable. Therefore expect the worst.
Carroll Quigley, professor of Georgetown Jesuit University admitted he has seen their plan, he knows their strategy and wondered why they don’t just impose it. He thought Socialism (Collectivism, Marxism) was a great system so why not just impose it if both parties are controlled by the same Oligarchy? He admitted he knew the Secret Societies behind the scenes orchestrating the agenda. He wondered why its taking so long. What he failed to understand is that there still is a resistance that may lead to revolt. The leaders don’t want that…. yet.
In reality I believe the voting serves not as a means to put in place what the citizens want. Democracy is the easiest form of government for an Oligarchy to control. It is Collectivism – the greater good of the whole is more important than the right of the individual. All they need is 51% of the mass to comply. Democracy is persuading a majority to comply with the agenda. But first they condition that majority and provide benfits seemingly doing good. But Socialism is a means of controlling distribution through heavy taxation, stifling growth of those who earn it to give out to those who have not. But selling it as “fair,” those who receive it will ALWAYS side with the one providing it.
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.”
― Alexander Fraser Tytler
The way I look at politics (promises offered to the public, but policies to further the State) is that the voting process merely is a reflection of what the people have been conditioned to accept. It tracks our tolerance and provides a measures of our desire. But it really doesn’t matter when the electoral college has been divided in such a manner as to give advantage to the Oligarchy despite popular vote.
I think the system is rigged. If not by actual mechanical means, at least by perception of compliance and propaganda to condition the people to persuade them to vote the “right way.” If that doesn’t matter they intervene. It doesn’t matter to the elite whether they get a republican or Democrat, they control both, so they sway one with that perception, then the other towards their synchronized solution that both didn’t realize how we got there.
The two sides are merely a Left/Right paradigm that is used to put our ideologies into absolute biased thinking where it can be controlled. It polarizes the citizens to thinking they have a say, when they actually don’t. Not really. In the end those controlling the wealth control the politicians who make policies. They have them in their pocket and use bribery, threat, or any other means to get their way (the end justifies the means – Jesuits).