Subliminal Psyops | podcast

Subliminal Psyops

In this episode we discuss how we are affected by subliminal stimuli and how it is used not only in psychological programming but in every day advertising and such. What triggers our subconscious? How does it affect our decisions? We also address what happens when our mind processes something a different way than it is because it has been suggested to see it that way.

Listen to “Subliminal Psyops” on Spreaker.

Several techniques imposed upon us for subliminal subconscious thought. They cause subliminal stimuli that makes our brain perceive it a certain way. For example you never notice a specific make or model of a vehicle until something makes you focus in one one brand, like when considering a certain vehicle. All of a sudden that is all you see on the road. Did more appear suddenly? Is that car more popular? No, just your perception changed to focus in on that model and now its all you see more of.

Advertisers use techniques to get their brand top of mind. They make subliminal connections with the viewer or .listeners by familiar scenarios, songs that stir memories, or connection with sounds, sights, and colors, etc.

Old school methods included deceiving techniques such as subliminal advertising where brief frames in a movie filmstrip contained pictures of cola to make the watcher thirsty.

Other means is to use a certain phrase that makes you relate and then choose something that reflects that. Like political candidates who use familiar and popularized buzzwords to catch your attention to them. “Drain the swamp” because a popular one during the trump campaign.

A tactic of “priming” also works. This is where the person subjects a pre-thought image, number, or other detail on the subject until that is subconsciously embedded in their mind. They when going to make a choice he subconsciously chooses that one. That was demonstrated in a movie called “Focus” with Will Smith. An example is showing a person the color orange repetitively before asking them to make a choice of fruit in a bowl of apples, pears, and oranges.

Perceived details also cause unfactual subliminal memories of something. There have been a debate over whether the memory of past details were misremembered, or perceived falsely at the time, or were actually a case of an actual supernatural phenomenon. I almost got a taste of this paradigm shift until I came to my senses and broke from the spell. It was compelling to have been sucked into the thinking of being witness to a quantum phenomenon, until I realized what was going on. I explain this in the podcast.

Many times what we perceive and that which had been subjected in society can be stronger than the actual fact. Until someone points out the correction a memory of substantiated stamped impression is made on the mind, which sees it how the brain interprets it subconsciously. Then when brought up the attention to it years later the person fails to accept what he remembers it in his mind and it causes a delusion. Think about it rationally, would a little trivial minor insignificant detail change naturally in a quantum dimensional parallel universe? Especially when many people think they saw it a certain way until brought attention to years later then question their own reality. This is how the Mandela Effect can be explained. Some claim the burden of proof it DIDN’T change lays on the person who remembers it and sees it how it has always been having no question of it ever changing. But the burden of proof to prove it DID change would lay on the person who claims it is not the same as they think it was in the past and supernaturally changed since the fact of reality how it always was is still the same. But to them the tally of witnesses remembering it perceived a different way outweigh the fact of it remaining. However, wouldn’t the tally of those who remember it how it still is also be weighed? So it becomes a consensus of tallied memory to weigh how many have more witnesses. Impossible to do.

This is the example I gave about words jumbled and the mind still perceiving what it expects how to see it even though it is in reality different from what they think they see.
https://www.sciencealert.com/word-jumble-meme-first-last-letters-cambridge-typoglycaemia

Share this article: